$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 12^th November, 2024 + W.P.(C) 11859/2018 RAJESH KUMAR JHA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anunaya Mehta and Mr. Vidhan Malik, Advocates.

versus CENTRAL RAILSIDE WAREHOUSE COMPANY LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. K.K. Tyagi, Mr. Iftekhar Ahmad and Ms. Garima Tyagi, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH

JUDGMENT

JYOTI SINGH, J. (ORAL)

1. This writ petition has been preferred on behalf of the Petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India laying a challenge to order dated 10.10.2017 passed by the Disciplinary Authority (‘DA’) whereby Petitioner has been removed from service of the Respondent/Central Railside Warehouse Company Limited and order dated 09.07.2018 by which the appeal was dismissed by Appellate Authority i.e. Board of Directors of the Respondent. Direction is sought to the Respondent to restore the employment of the Petitioner and reinstate him with all consequential benefits.

2. Case of the Petitioner as set out in the writ petition is that Respondent which is a Government of India Undertaking published an advertisement on Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 11859/2018 Page 1 o