$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 13.11.2024 + W.P.(C) 6098/2016 KRISHAN KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. H.S. Dahiya and Mr. Yuv Dahiya, Advs.

versus DIRECTOR GENERAL CISF & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Saroj Bidawat, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR

O R D E R

% 13.11.2024 NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (Oral)

1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Order dated 31.05.2012 passed by the Senior Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force (in short “CISF”), terminating the services of the petitioner on the ground that he had concealed, in his attestation form and in the questionnaire form, that he had been prosecuted in Case No. 81/06 under Sections 341, 323, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, which had been registered and for which a Charge Sheet No. 67/06, dated 19.07.2006 had been framed at Bagad Police Station, Rajasthan against him.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that the FIR, that has been referred to by the respondents in the Impugned Order, had been registered on Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 6098/2016 Page 1 of 14 an incident arising out of an altercation betwe