$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 2^nd December, 2024 + C.R.P. 187/2023, CM APPL. 36208/2023 (stay)

BARKHA SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Hrithik Jarodia Proxy for Mr.

Rajiv Mangla, Advocate.

Mr. Mir Akhtar Hussain, Advocate.

versus VIKRAM .....Respondent Through: None CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G E M E N T(oral)

CM APPL.36209/2023 (Exemption)

1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The Application stands disposed of.

C.R.P. 187/2023

3. The Petition under Section 115 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 („CPC‟ hereinafter) has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner (plaintiff in the Suit) against the impugned Order dated 17.03.2023 whereby her Application for seeking Interrogatories, has been dismissed.

4. The revisionist has stated that Respondent-Vikram (Defendant in the Suit) has claimed that Smt. Bhagwati Devi, grandmother, who was the original owner of the Property bearing No. RZ-6-153, Raj Nagar-II, Palam, C.R.P. 187/2023 Page 1 of 6 Signature Not Verified DigitallySigned By:VIKAS New Delhi admeasuring 100 sq. yards (hereinafter referred to as “subject property”) had sold 40 sq. yards o