Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, AMIT SHARMA, JJ
STATE NCT OF DELHI – Appellant
Versus
ANAMUL ANSARI & ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background and context of investigation (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments on appeal maintenance and interlocutory order (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 3. court's analysis of orders and implications (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 32 , 36 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 46 , 50 , 62 , 70 , 76 , 78) |
| 4. understanding of interlocutory vs final orders (Para 30 , 31 , 34 , 35 , 61) |
| 5. conclusion on the state's application for extension (Para 80 , 81 , 82) |
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
1. The present appeal has been filed by the Appellant – State under Section 21 of the National Investigating Agency Act, 2008 (hereinafter “NIA Act”) read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter “ BNS S ”), challenging the impugned order dated 18th November, 2024, passed by the ld. Additional Sessions Judge-02, New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi, arising out of FIR No. 301/2024 dated 15th July, 2024, registered at P.S. Special Cell (Delhi) under Section 61 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter “ BNS ”).
2. Vide the impugned order, the Trial Court has rejected an application filed by the State seeking extension of time for
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
