SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Del) 33599

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
KESHAVAMURTHY RAMAIAH – Appellant
Versus
UROLOGICAL SOCIETY OF INDIA & ORS. – Respondent


$~

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 13.12.2024 + CS(OS) 927/2024 KESHAVAMURTHY RAMAIAH ...Plaintiff Through: Mr. Ashutosh Dubey, Mr. M.

Veerbhadriah, Mr. Abhishek Chauhan, Mr. Amit and Mr.

Amit Kumar, Advocates versus UROLOGICAL SOCIETY OF INDIA & ORS. ...Defendants Through: Mr. Pran Bora, Senior Advocate with Ms. Anasuya Choudhury and Mr. Abhinav Jha, Advocates for D-1 & 2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

JUDGMENT

SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J.

I.A. 45947/2024 (under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2)

1. The present application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2, read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [hereafter „CPC‟] has been filed on behalf of the applicant/ plaintiff herein, seeking grant of ad-interim ex-parte injunction in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants.

Signature Not Verified CS(OS) 927/2024 Page 1 of 18 Digitally Signed FACTUAL CONTEXT

2. The facts of the case, as discernible from the application and the suit, are that the plaintiff is a urologist with over 27 years of professional experience, and he is currently serving as Professor and Head of the Department of Urology and Director in-charge of the Institute of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top