IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH, JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA, JJ
RAM PREET – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
Background:
2. The present appeal has been filed on behalf of the Appellant-Ram Preet under Section 374 (2) read with Section 383 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter, ‘Cr.PC.’) assailing the impugned judgment of conviction and order on sentence dated 2nd March, 2020 and 6th March, 2020 respectively, passed by Sh. Mohd. Farrukh, ASJ-05 Special Judge (POCSO Act) Central District, Tis Hazari Court, New Delhi. The Appellant has been convicted in Sessions Case No. 812/2017 arising out of FIR No. 113/2017 registered at P.S. Gulabi Bagh under Sections 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 3/4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter, the ‘POCSO’ Act)
3. Vide the impugned judgment of conviction and order on sentence, the Appellant has been convicted for offences punishable under Section 376 (2) (i) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 6 of the POCSO Act. The Appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life for offence punishable under Section 6 of the POCSO Act along with fine of Rs.10,000/. In default of the fine




Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.