$-22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on : 12.01.2023 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 200/2022 & CM APPL. 54168-54171/2022 HARKESH KUMAR DANG ..... Appellant versus TAMANNA DANG ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case:

For the Appellants: Mr. Sunil Dalal, Senior Advocate with Mr.Sujeet Beniwal, Mr.Nitish Pande, Ms.Manisa Saroha and Ms.Pratibha Varun, Advocates For the Respondents: Mr. Sunil Mittal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dhruv Grover, Mr. Gandharv Kharbanda, Mr. Sanjiv Saluja and Ms. Shreya Maggu, Advocates with respondent in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN

JUDGMENT

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

1. Appellant/father (Harkesh Kumar Dang) impugns order dated 12.12.2022 of the Family Court whereby the Family Court has held that the ordinary place of residence of the child ‘Vivaan Dang’ being Munich, Germany, the Courts at Delhi would have no territorial jurisdiction and accordingly dismissed the Guardianship Petition filed Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed MAT.APP.(F.C.) 200/2022 1 by the Appellant/Petitioner (father of the child), under section 7 read with sections 8, 12 and 25 of the Guardian & Wards Ac