SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Del) 17108

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
VIKRAMJEET SINGH @ VICKY @ TANNU – Appellant
Versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. & ORS. – Respondent
BAIL APPLN.-413/2023



$~104 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 413/2023 VIKRAMJEET SINGH @ VICKY @ TANNU ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Navneet Dogra, Adv.

versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Sahni, APP for the State Ms. Ankita Wilson, Adv. for R-2.

% Date of Decision: 7th February, 2023 CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA

J U D G M E N T

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J. (Oral)

1. This is an application seeking interim bail in case FIR No. 699/2016 registered at PS Govindpuri under Section 323/376 IPC and Section 6 POCSO. The interim bail is sought on behalf of the petitioner for 10 days on the ground of marriage in the close family from 08.02.2023 to

10.02.2023.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was earlier granted interim bail twice and the liberty was not misused by him.

3. Learned APP for the State has opposed the bail application on the BAIL APPLN. 413/2023 Page 1 of 3 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed ground that the marriage ceremony is of the cousin sister.

4. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that the probability of the petitioner absconding is very high and therefore, the petitioner may not be released on bail.

5. I have considered the submissions of the parties. The factum of the marriage in close family of the petitioner has already been verified by the learned Trial Court.

6. In the totality of the facts and circumstances, the petitioner be admitted to bail for 10 days i.e. till 17.02.2023 on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/-, with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Trial Court subject to the following conditions:

a) the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case;

b)the petitioner shall provide his/her mobile number(s) to the Police In charge of the case and keep it operational at all times;

c) the petitioner shall drop a PIN on the Google map to ensure that his location is available to the Police In charge; and d)in case of a change of residential address and/or mobile number, the petitioner shall intimate the same to the Investigating Officer/

Court concerned by way of an affidavit.

5. In the above terms, the application stands disposed of

6. A copy of the order be sent to the concerned Jail Superintendent for BAIL APPLN. 413/2023 Page 2 of 3 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed information and compliance.

7. Copy of this order be given dasti under the signature of the Court Master.

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J FEBRUARY 7, 2023/

Pallavi BAIL APPLN. 413/2023 Page 3 of 3 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top