IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
AMIT BANSAL, J
WINZO GAMES PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
GOOGLE LLC – Respondent
JUDGMENT
AMIT BANSAL, J. (Oral)
I.A. 4439/2022 (O-XXXIX R-1 & 2 of the CPC)
1. The present application has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) seeking to restrain the defendants from displaying any warning against the use of the gaming platform/application ‘WinZO Games’ of the plaintiff on theAndroid Operating System/s.
2. Notice was issued in the application on 22nd March, 2022 and reply thereto has subsequently been filed on behalf of the defendant no.1. Plaintiff has also filed a rejoinder to the reply filed by the defendant no.1.
3. Arguments in the application were heard on 8th February, 2022 and both sides have filed a brief note of their submissions.
FACTUALMATRIX
4. The case set up by the plaintiff is as under:
4.1 The plaintiff is a digital gaming and technology company that operates an online digital gaming platform/application under the marks ‘WinZO’/ ‘WinZO Games’.
4.2 The plaintiff has registrations/has applied for registrations in respect of the marks WinZO’ and ‘WinZO Games’ in Classes 38, 41 and 42, details of which are given in paragraph 5 of the plaint.
4.3 The plaintiff enjoys considerable goodwil
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.