IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
ADITYA BIRLA FINANCE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
SITI NETWORKS LIMITED – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner submitting a request for arbitration. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 10 , 12) |
| 2. argument regarding the non-signatory's involvement. (Para 46 , 63 , 66 , 70) |
| 3. court's analysis on arbitration agreement applicability. (Para 204 , 205 , 218) |
| 4. the doctrine of group of companies is found applicable. (Para 206 , 212 , 221) |
| 5. decision on the referral to arbitration. (Para 240 , 248 , 250) |
JUDGMENT
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
I.A. No. 6182/2022 in O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 414/2021 (by the petitioner seeking condonation of 6 days delay in filing reply to IA No.4739/2022)
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The delay of 6 days in filing reply to the application is condoned and the reply is taken on record.
Application is disposed of.
I.A. No. 7938/2022 in O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 414/2021 (by the respondent No.2 seeking condonation of 3 days delay in filing written submissions and for taking written submissions on record)
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and delay of 3 days in filing the written submissions is condoned. The written submissions are taken on record.
Application is disposed of.
Arb.P. 474/2022 & O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 414/2021
1. By




Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.