Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT, GNCTD – Appellant
Versus
STAR BUS SERVICES PVT LTD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and factual backdrop. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. petitioner's arguments against the award. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. respondent's defense and procedural observations. (Para 16 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. further arguments from the respondent regarding conception of the award. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 5. court's assessment of procedural aspects of the arbitration statute. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 6. court's role in arbitration reviews and limited grounds for interference. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 7. arbitration act's expectations regarding arbitrators' timelines. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 8. final considerations regarding intervention in the arbitral award. (Para 51 , 52 , 54 , 55) |
| 9. conclusion set aside of the award due to delays that violated public policy. (Para 124 , 125) |
-
JUDGMENT
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
FACTUAL MATRIX
1. The petitioner has preferred the present petition raising objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) for setting aside the Arbitral Award dated 9 th June, 2020 1 passed in the matter titled "Star Bus Services Pvt Ltd vs Department of Tr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
