$~4 & 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 07^th August 2023 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 201/2023 & CM APPLs. 35230/2023, 35231/2023, 35232/2023 MOHIT MITTAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. J.K. Bhola, Advocate with appellant in person.

versus KANIKA JAIN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Yakesh Anand & Mr.

Akshay Thakur, Advocates.

5 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 202/2023 & CM APPLs. 35233/2023, 35234/2023, 35235/2023 MOHIT MITTAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. J.K. Bhola, Advocate with appellant in person.

versus KANIKA JAIN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Yakesh Anand & Mr.

Akshay Thakur, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T (oral)

1. The present Appeals under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act has been filed on behalf of the appellant/husband against the impugned Order dated 19.04.2023 vide which the two Applications under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 in HMA No. 1496/2018 and HMA No. 843/2018 claiming maintenance in the sum of Rs. 88,000/- per month or one-time Signature Not Verified DigitallySigned By:SAHIL MAT.APP.(F.C.) 201/2023 & MAT.APP.(F.C.) 202/2023 Page 1 of 7 expense of Rs. 4-5 lakhs as maintena