$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 04th October, 2023 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 276/2019 & CM APPLs. 46546/2019, 46547/2019 ANIL KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Monica Kapoor, Advocate.

versus NEETU ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Dipika Saxena, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T (oral)

CM APPL. 46546/2019 (Condonation of delay)

1. The present Application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 has been filed on behalf of the applicant/appellant seeking condonation of 99 days’ delay in filing the present appeal.

2. For the reasons and grounds stated in the present application, the application is allowed, the delay of 99 days in filing the present appeal is hereby condoned.

3. Accordingly, the present application is disposed of.

MAT. APP. (F.C.) 276/2019

4. The present Appeal has been preferred under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 by the appellant/husband challenging the Order dated 13.05.2019 of the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, granting interim Signature Not Verified DigitallySigned By:SAHIL MAT.APP. (F.C.) 276/2019 Page 1 of 5 maintenance in the sum of Rs. 8,000/- pe