SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Del) 18064

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, Vikas Mahajan, JJ
MASTER ADITYA VIKRAM KANSAGRA & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
MR. PERRY KANSAGARA – Respondent
MAT. APP. (F.C.) 115/2020



Advocates:
For the Appellant: Mr. Prosenjeet Banerjee, Ms. Mansi Sharma, Ms. Shreya Singhal and Ms. Astha Baderiya
For the Respondents: Ex-Parte

Court determined maintenance claims under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act are proceedings subject to fixed court fees, rather than ad-valorem fees, ensuring equitable access to justice for claimants.

Headnote:(A) Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 18 and 20 - Court Fees Act, 1870 - Maintenance claim - Family Court's imposition of ad-valorem court fees on maintenance applications deemed unconstitutional and unfair; fixed fees apply instead - Courts must adhere to principles of equitable accessibility to justice. (Paras 23-37)

(B) Judicial jurisdiction - Clarification on Family Court's jurisdiction and nature of proceedings pertaining to maintenance claims - Nature of such claims as applications, not suits, emphasizes the need for fixed fees to avoid discrimination against vulnerable parties. (Paras 27-38)

Facts of the case:
The Appellants, a minor son and his mother, petitioned the Family Court for maintenance under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act against the Respondent, who failed to adequately represent his interests. The Family Court's decision required the Appellants to segregate claims, imposing ad-valorem fees based on the claimed amount.

Findings of Court:
The Family Court erred in its assessment of fees; claims for maintenance should be treated as proceedings governed by fixed fees as per relevant statutes to ensure justice.

Issues: The main issue concerned the correct categorization of maintenance claims under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act regarding fee structures and equitable access to justice.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that maintenance claims must be recognized as unique proceedings not subject to the same burdensome fee structures as suits to prevent discriminatory practices.

Result: Petition allowed; respondents must pay fixed court fees.

Table of Content
1. court fees for maintenance claims should be fixed, not ad-valorem. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 22 , 24)
2. the nature of proceedings under the hindu adoption and maintenance act governs fee structures. (Para 6 , 7 , 12 , 38)
3. family court jurisdiction supports equitable resolution of maintenance claims. (Para 27 , 29 , 30)

JUDGMENT

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

1. Appellant impugns order dated 22.02.2020 whereby in respect of a petition filed by the Appellants, under Section 18 and 20 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), the Family Court directed the appellants to segregate the amount of maintenance claimed by each of them and directed Appellant No. 2 to pay ad-valorem court fee on the amount claimed by her.

2. Appellant No. 1 is the son of the Respondent and the Appellant No. 2 is the wife of the Respondent and mother of Appellant No. 1. Appellants filed the subject proceedings under Section 18 and 20 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act claiming maintenance from the Respondent.

3. The Family Court has held that as the Appellants have filed a Suit under Section 18 and 20 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, ad-valorem Court Fee is payable in terms of Section 7 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 .

4. Per contra, learned counsel for the Appellants contends that the proceedings under Section 18 and 20 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act are proceedings and not a Civil Suit and as such fixed court fee is payable as per the second Schedule.

5. Respondent was served with the notice of the appeal and had entered appearance and was represented through Counsel. On 20.05.2022, counsel for the Respondent stated that the Respondent had withdrawn the power of attorney granted to them to represent him and accordingly the vakalatnama of the Counsel was discharged and default notice was directed to be sent to the Respondent. On 12.09.2022, despite service of notice, none appeared for the Respondent and accordingly, respondent was proceeded ex-parte.

6. The question that arises for consideration is as to whether ad valorem court fee is payable on a claim for maintenance filed under Section 18 and 20 Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 ?

7. Maintenance can be broadly claimed by a Hindu wife under three provisions. Firstly under Section 18 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, secondly under Section 24 and 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and thirdly under Section 125 Criminal Procedure Code., 1973 and a son under Section 20 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act and under Section 125 Criminal Procedure Code.

8. The relevant provisions of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 read as under:

“18. Maintenance of wife.––(1) Subject to the provisions of this Section, a Hindu wife, whether married before or after the commencement of this Act, shall be entitled to be maintained by her husband during her lifetime.

(2) A Hindu wife shall be entitled to live separately from her husband without forfeiting her claims to maintenance,––

(a) if he is guilty of desertion, that is to say, of abandoning her without reasonable cause and without her consent or against her wish, or of wilfully neglecting her ;

(b) if he has treated her with such cruelty as to cause a reasonable apprehension in her mind that it will be harmful or injurious to live with her husband ;

(c) ******

(d) if he has any other wife living ;

(e) if he keeps a concubine in the same house in which his wife is living or habitually resides with a concubine elsewhere ;

(f) if he has ceased to be a Hindu by conversion to another religion ;

(g) if there is any other cause justifying her living separately.

(3) A Hindu wife shall not be entitled to separate residence and maintenance from her husband if she is unchaste or cease to be a Hindu by conversion to another religion.

***** ** **

20. Maintenance of children and aged parents.––(1) Subject to the provisions of this Section, a Hindu is bound, during his or her lifetime, to maintain hi


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top