$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 26th December, 2023 + CM(M) 2151/2023 AMRITESH JATIA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Aadaish Katnani, Ms. Pragati Srivastava, Ms. Ishita Aggarwal & Ms. Pranya Madan, Advocates.

versus VIDHI BINANI JATIA ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Manali Singhal, Ms. Shreya Singhal, Mr. Deepak Singh Rawat & Ms. Mhasi Keditsu, Advocates with respondent in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T (oral)

CM APPL. 67481/2023 (Exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application is disposed of.

CM(M) 2151/2023

3. The present Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed on behalf of the petitioner to set aside the impugned Order dated 20.12.2023 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court-02, South, Saket Courts, Delhi and direct the respondent not to remove their children, namely, Aadidev and Adira (hereinafter referred to as the “minor children”) from the jurisdiction of this Court and India, without seeking leave of the Family Court and without filing the detailed itinerary before the learned Family Court as well as to deposit the