SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Del) 7044

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ROHIT KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 3250/2021 ROHIT KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Pradeep Kumar Arya, Mr. Raj Karan Sharma, Mr. Aditya Kumar Yadav, Ms. Anusha Panwar, Mr. Prateek Singh and Mr. Gaurav Chaudhary, Advs.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Sahni, APP for the State with SI % Date of Decision: 7th December, 2022 CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA

J U D G M E N T

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J. (Oral)

BAIL APPLN. 3250/2021

1. Present application has been moved under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No. 419/2021 lodged on 29th July, 2021 at PS Hari Nagar under Sections 419/420/120B/34 IPC read with Section 66C/66(D) I.T. Act, 2000.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that all the accused persons have already been admitted to bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that in fact the petitioner is an actor and producer in the bollywood and has produced certain successful movies. It has been BAIL APPLN. 3250/2022 Page 1 of 5 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:RAJ submitted that that the accused has been falsely implicated in the present case as his brother Sanjeev Kumar was arres

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top