IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ROHIT KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 3250/2021 ROHIT KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Pradeep Kumar Arya, Mr. Raj Karan Sharma, Mr. Aditya Kumar Yadav, Ms. Anusha Panwar, Mr. Prateek Singh and Mr. Gaurav Chaudhary, Advs.
versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Sahni, APP for the State with SI % Date of Decision: 7th December, 2022 CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
J U D G M E N T
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J. (Oral)
BAIL APPLN. 3250/2021
1. Present application has been moved under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No. 419/2021 lodged on 29th July, 2021 at PS Hari Nagar under Sections 419/420/120B/34 IPC read with Section 66C/66(D) I.T. Act, 2000.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that all the accused persons have already been admitted to bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that in fact the petitioner is an actor and producer in the bollywood and has produced certain successful movies. It has been BAIL APPLN. 3250/2022 Page 1 of 5 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:RAJ submitted that that the accused has been falsely implicated in the present case as his brother Sanjeev Kumar was arres
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.