SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 9807

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
SH. VINEET GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
M/S INDIAN BIODIESAL LIMITED & ORS – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.

I.A. 17394/2022 (under Order VI Rule 17 CPC filed on behalf of the plaintiff)

1. The present application under Order VI Rule 17 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as “CPC”), has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff to amend the plaint.

2. It is submitted in the application that the plaintiff has filed the suit for Specific Performance of Agreement to Sell/Contract dated 14.08.2011 and for Perpetual Injunction and Declaration.

3. It is submitted that one Satya Pal Singh, who was a witness to the Agreement to Sell, informed the plaintiff on 20.09.2019 that he has come to know on 15.09.2019 that another Sale Deed dated 10.07.2014 had been executed by defendant No.3, 4 and 5 before the Sub-Registrar, Hauz Khas, Delhi in favour of two individuals namely, Ravinder Singh and his wife Pushpa Lata, both residents of village Hauz Khas, New Delhi.

4. The plaintiff obtained the certified copy of the Sale Deed on 25.09.2019. On an application under Order I Rule 10 CPC moved by the plaintiff, Ravinder Singh and Pushpa Lata have been impleaded as defendant No.7 and 8 vide Order dated 22.12.2021.

5. The plaintiff h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top