HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MANMOHAN, A, C, Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, JJ
SHAILENDRA – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY DIRECTOR (LM) (SOUTH ZONE-II) – Respondent
W.P.(C) 4505/2024
MANMOHAN, ACJ : (ORAL) C.M.No.20987/2024
1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.
C.M.No.20986/2024
3. Present application has been filed on behalf of respondent-DDA under Section 151 CPC, 1908 seeking modification of order dated 27th March, 2024 to the extent that Land Acquisition Collector (LAC) may be directed to hand over possession of land comprising Khasra Nos. 1883(4-16), 1884(4-
16) and 1885(4-16) situated at Village Chhatarpur, New Delhi free from all encumbrances to the Respondent-DDA on 09th April, 2024, instead of only two Khasra numbers which have been directed to be handed over by this Court vide order dated 27th March, 2024. The respondent-DDA also seeks modification of the order to the extent that the directions for an enquiry to be carried out by Commissioner, Land Management (LM) against the Deputy Director be withdrawn.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant/respondent-DDA states that the possession of the land pertaining to Khasra No. 1885 (4-16) of Village Chhatarpur, New Delhi had been handed over to DDA through Land & Building Department on 31st December, 2013 despite a stay granted by this Court in favour of respondent no.3 in W.P.(C) 1786/1999. He states that consequently, a contempt petition being Contempt Case (C) No.688 of 2014 was filed on 25th November, 2014 and the said contempt case was subsequently disposed of by this Court as the DDA had purged the contempt petition by returning possession of Khasra No.1885 (4-16) to the petitioner in the said petition.
5. He states that in respect to the reply to RTI application dated 18th August, 2023 (wherein it was stated that physical possession of Khasra No. 1885 (4-16) was handed over to DDA on 31st December, 2013) was issued by the NL-II branch of LM Department which maintains the land records of DDA. He states that the said branch however does not have the requisite records of litigation and the said branch has given the reply of RTI application on the basis of its record which was incomplete. He states that the letters dated 04th January, 2024 and 22nd March, 2024 were issued by the Deputy Director of concerned Land Management zone i.e. LM South Zone- II which has all the relevant records of land and litigation pertaining to the land in question.
6. In view of the above, present application is allowed and the order dated 27th Mach, 2024 is modified to the extent that the LAC will hand over possession of land comprising Khasra Nos. 1883(4-16), 1884(4-16) and 1885(4-16) situated at Village Chhatarpur, New Delhi free from all encumbrances to the respondent-DDA on 09th April, 2024, instead of only two Khasra numbers which had been directed to be handed over by this Court vide order dated 27th March, 2024. Further the direction issued vide order dated 27th March, 2024 directing an enquiry to be carried out by the Commissioner, LM against the Deputy Director is withdrawn. Accordingly, the order dated 27th March, 2024 shall now read as under:-
1. Present public interest petition has been filed seeking issuance of directions to the respondents to take physical possession of the property bearing Khasra nos.1883 (4-16), 1884 (4-16), 1885 (4-16) at Village Chattarpur, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘subject property’).
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that subject property was notified under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’),
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.