SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 11082

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J
SHRI RAVINDER KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
M/S GIGANTIC IMPEX PVT LTD – Respondent
CS(OS) 3337/2014 & connected matters



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Mr. Rajesh Bansal, Ms. Muskaan Mehra
For the Respondents: Ms. Maneesha Dhir, Mr. Karan Batura, Ms. Karishma Malani

The intention of the parties regarding property transfer must be established through evidence, and suits cannot be dismissed for non-payment of sale consideration without examining factual disputes.

Headnote:(A) Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 55(4)(b) - Cancellation of sale deeds - Plaintiffs sought to cancel sale deeds executed by the Defendants due to non-payment of sale consideration and allegations of fraud. The Court found that the intention of the parties regarding the transfer of ownership needed to be established through evidence. (Paras 20, 21, 35)

(B) Pleadings - Order VII Rule 11 CPC - The Court ruled that the plaint cannot be rejected at this stage as there are disputed questions and the intention of the parties must be determined through evidence. (Paras 36, 37)

Facts of the case:
The Plaintiffs filed suits for cancellation of sale deeds regarding land parcels, alleging non-payment and fraud by the Defendants. The Defendants claimed the suits were not maintainable under Section 55(4)(b) of the Act.

Findings of Court:
The Court held that the suits cannot be dismissed under Order VII Rule 11 as there are factual disputes that require evidence.

Issues: The main issue was whether the suits were maintainable given the provisions of Section 55(4)(b) of the Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court emphasized that the intention of the parties regarding the transfer of ownership must be established through evidence, and the mere execution of sale deeds does not suffice if the sale consideration is unpaid.

Result: Applications dismissed.

JUDGEMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J.

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

I.A. 25435/2015 (u/O VII Rule 11 CPC) in CS(OS) 3337/2014 I.A. 5443/2015 (u/O VII Rule 11 CPC) in CS(OS) 3338/2014 I.A. 2915/2015 (u/O VII Rule 11 CPC) in CS(OS) 2524/2015 Background

2. These three suits have been filed seeking declaration and cancellation of sale deeds in respect of three parcels of land. The details of the said lands are as under:

    Three portions of the Land comprising in Khata/Khatoni No.21/25, bearing Khasra No.11/7/2 (12-17), 20/1/2 (17-19), 2/2/2 (1-9), 24/22/2(1-19), 25/21(4-12), 33/6 (4-9), 16/1 (1-9), 25/2 (3-2), 34/1(4-12), 2(4-16), 9(4-16), 10(4-16), 11 (4-16), 12 (4-16), 19 (4-16), 20 (4-16), 21 (4-16), 22 (4-16), 23/1 (1-0), 26 (0-12), 36/1 (4-16), 2 (4-16), 3 (4-16), 8 (1-18), 9 (4-16), 10 (4-16), 37/5/2 (2-10), 6/1 (1-12), 15/2 (0-14), 16/1 (1-0), 105/84(1-1), 138(3-11), 141/1(0-5), situated in the Revenue Estate of Village Pandwala Kalan, New Delhi. The particulars of the three suits are:
    Manoj Kumar
S. No Suit Area of the Property
1 In CS(OS) 3337/2014 Area of land total measuring 133 bighas 03 biswas – property of Sh. Ravinder Kumar
2 In CS(OS) 3338/2014 Area of land total measuring 121 bighas 15 biswas - property of Sh. Ramesh Kumar
3 In CS(OS) 2524/2015 Area of land total measuring 131 Bighas 04 Biswas-property of Sh. Manoj Kumar
S. No Suit Area of the Property
1 In CS(OS) 3337/2014 Area of land total measuring 133 bighas 03 biswas – property of Sh. Ravinder Kumar
2 In CS(OS) 3338/2014 Area of land total measuring 121 bighas 15 biswas - property of Sh. Ramesh Kumar
3 In CS(OS) 2524/2015 Area of land total measuring 131 Bighas 04 Biswas-property of Sh. Manoj Kumar

3. CS(OS) 3337/2014 and CS(OS) 3338/2014 have been filed by Ravinder Kumar and Ramesh Kumar, respectively, seeking cancellation of the sale deed dated 12th September, 2013, and a permanent injunction restraining M/s Gigantic Impex Pvt. Ltd. from interfering with the suit property i.e., land situated at Revenue Estate of Village, Pandwala Kalan, New Delhi as provided in paragraph 1 of the plaint.

4. On the other hand, CS(OS) 2524/2015 has been filed by Manoj Kumar, seeking cancellation of the sale deed dated 12th September, 2013, and a permanent injunction restraining Zest Hightech Pvt. Ltd. from interfering with the suit property i.e., land situated at Revenue Estate of Village, Pandwala Kalan, New Delhi as provided in paragraph 1 of the plaint.

5. The Plaintiffs in the suit are Sh. Ravinder Kumar, Sh. Ramesh Kumar and Sh. Manoj Kumar. The Defendants in these suits are M/s Gigantic Impex Pvt. Ltd. and Zest Hightech Pvt. Ltd.

6. These cases pertain to a dispute over the ownership and sale of various portions of the land of the suit property in the three suits i.e., first portion admeasuring 133 bighas 03 biswas in CS(OS) 3337/2014, second portion measuring 121 bighas 15 biswas in CS(OS) 3338/2014 and third portion 131 bighas 04 biswas in CS(OS) 2524/2015. The suit property situated in the Revenue Estate of Village Pandwala Kalan, New Delhi is stated to be jointly owned by the Plaintiffs as co-sharers.

7. In the suits it is alleged by the Plaintiffs that despite the absence of a legal partition among the co-sharers, the Defendants’ (i.e., M/s Gigantic Impex Pvt. Ltd. in CS(OS) 3337/2014, CS(OS) 3338/2014 and Zest Hightech Pvt. Ltd in CS(OS) 2524/2015) representative, along with the Plaintiffs’ relatives, expressed interest in purchasing the lands at the rate of Rs.4,10,00,000/- per acre. Subsequently, negotiations took place regarding the sale consideration, culminating in an agreement where the Defendants agreed to purchase the land at a specified price per acre, out of which, Rs.53,00,000/- per acre shall be paid vide cheque/bank draft as it is the market price fixed by the Govt. of NCT of Delhi and remaining consideration amount shall be paid in cash. The negotiations are claimed to have taken place at the residence of the

                                                                  Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                                                                  1
                                                                  2
                                                                  3
                                                                  4
                                                                  5
                                                                  6
                                                                  7
                                                                  8
                                                                  9
                                                                  10
                                                                  11
                                                                  SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                                                                  supreme today icon
                                                                  logo-black

                                                                  An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                                                                  Please visit our Training & Support
                                                                  Center or Contact Us for assistance

                                                                  qr

                                                                  Scan Me!

                                                                  India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                                                                  For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                                                                  whatsapp-icon Back to top