HIGH COURT OF DELHI
RAJIV JAISWAL – Appellant
Versus
THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
JYOTI SINGH, J. (ORAL)
1. This writ petition has been preferred on behalf of the Petitioner under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:
“A. Direct the respondent to add 4 extra years of service of petitioner in his actual 28 years of service for calculation of pension as per the rule 26 of the Chapter IV of “General Insurance (Employees’) Pension Scheme, 1995.
B. Direct the respondent to revise/enhance the pension of the petitioner by calculating 32 years of service of the petitioner as per the rule 26 of the Chapter IV of “General Insurance (Employees’) Pension Scheme, 1995.
C. Direct the respondent to pay the entire arrear of pension and commutation value which is actual difference of the monthly pension amount and commutation value with interest @ 24 % p.a since the petitioner retired from his service 31-07-2015 till the revision/enhancement of the pension of the petitioner.
D. Pass any other or such further order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case in order to secure the ends of justice.
E. Award the costs of proceedings.”
2. As per the narrative of facts in the writ petition, an adv
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.