HIGH COURT OF DELHI
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J
SANJEEV KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS – Respondent
1. Considering the fact that comments placed by the petitioner in the Chat Box during the course of proceedings through Video Conferencing on 06.05.2024 are patently contemptuous and interfere with due course of judicial proceedings to scandalize the Court and undermine authority of the Court, petitioner was directed to show-cause vide order dated 09.05.2024 as to why notice for contempt be not issued and contempt proceedings initiated against him and referred to concerned Roster Bench/Division Bench for consideration in accordance with law.
2. At this stage, it is pertinent to recapitulate that petitioner had preferred an application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C . before the learned MM for registration of FIR in respect of rape committed upon his wife by her cousin when she was 16 years of age. Shri Rishabh Tanwar, learned MM declined to exercise the powers under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C . for ordering investigation and registration of FIR but granted an opportunity to the petitioner/complainant to examine himself under Section 200 Cr.P.C . Aggrieved against the said order, a Revision Petition was preferred by the petitioner before Shri Lokesh Kumar Sharma, learned ASJ which was
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.