SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 21670

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR, J
SMT ARCHANA SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
SMT KANTA JAIN – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Mohinder Kumar Madan
For the Respondents:

ORDER

% 08.04.2024 CM APPL. 20732/2024 (exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Applications stands disposed of.

CM APPL. 20733/2024—8 days in re-filing

3. The present application has been filed on behalf of the appellant seeking condonation of delay of 8 days in re-filing the petition.

4. In view of the ground as mentioned in the application, the delay of 8 days in re-filing the petition is condoned.

5. Application stands disposed of.

CM(M) 2306/2024

6. The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed impugning the order dated 12.12.2023 passed by the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as ‗Trial Court‘), in RCT No.22/2022 titled as ―Smt. Kanta Jain vs. Smt. Archana Sharma‖, whereby the order dated 03.12.2021 passed by learned ARC-02, Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in Case No.309/2017 has been set aside.

7. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent has filed an eviction petition under Section 14(1)(a) & (j) of Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter referred as ‗DRC Act‘) against the petitioner. The petitioner entered appearance, filed writte

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top