HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Anish Dayal, J
BAIL APPLN. 2165/2024
1.This petition has been filed seeking bail to the petitioner in FIR No. RC2242022A0001/ CBI/AC-VI(SIT)/ NEW DELHI under sections120-B/409/420/477-A Indian Penal Code, 1860 (“IPC”) and Sections 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (“PC Act”) dated 20th June, 2022.
2.Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner points out that the petitioner was arrested on 13th July, 2022 and was granted interim bail on the medical grounds on 31st August, 2022, subsequently extended on 03rd February, 2023 by this Court. The said interim bail was exhausted on 02nd March, 2024 when the petitioner surrendered.
3.The present petition has been filed seeking regular bail for medical reasons on the basis of the facts and circumstances as placed on record and as canvassed by the Senior Counsel.
4.It is noted that the regular bail has been rejected on merits by this Court on 31st May, 2024 in Bail Application No.353/2023. In this light, the prayer in the current petition has been restricted to seeking bail on medical grounds.
5.However, it is noted that the medical grounds have been canvassed by the petitioner in various previous bail applications and orders were passed, which are noted as under:
2024. It was specifically directed that the petitioner shall continue to be in custody of Jail Superintendent who shall ensure adequate security arrangements. Expenses incurred on hospitalisation etc. were to be borne entirely by the applicant in addition to the incidental expenses incurred by the State on travelling, security etc. In para 6 of the said order, further conditions were placed on the family of the petitioner to not carry mobile phones while meeting the petitioner, though home-cooked food was permitted, if so medically advised.
(iv)On 30th May, 2024, medical status report of the petitioner on Fortis Hospital was received. As per the report, it was noted that treatment was continuing. However, as per the diagnosis, there was a medical condition relating to the eye of the petitioner. It was advised that the particular specific treatment was not available in Fortis Hospital, but available at “The Sight Avenue”, a specialised clinic in Greater Kailash-I, New Delhi.
Directions were given for applicant to be taken for eye treatment from Fortis Hospital under custody and Jail Superintendent was directed to ensure adequate security during the transit period.
(v)In the meantime, on 31st May, 2024, this Court rejected the regular bail application of the petitione
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.