SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 30937

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHR, J
RAJSHREE VERMA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) AND ANR. – Respondent


Advocates:
RUPAL LUTHRA

ORDER

% 23.09.2024

1. By way of present petition, the petitioner seeks setting aside of the order dated 22.04.2022 as well as the order dated 17.08.2022 passed by learned Trial Court vide which the respondent no.2 was admitted to regular bail in FIR No.361/2021 registered under Section 376 IPC at PS Daryaganj, Delhi.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner/applicant has assailed the impugned orders on two grounds- firstly, that he was not given proper opportunity of being heard and secondly, that the reading of the impugned order would show that there was no application of judicial mind. In support of the aforesaid contentions, he submits that there were certain WhatsApp messages exchanged between the parties and reading of the same would show that there were certain indirect threats. He further submits that while it was a regular bail application, the impugned orders record grant of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 on the other hand has defended the impugned order by contending that the bail application was listed on multiple dates and even on the date of the passing of the impugned order, the petitioner/complainant was present along with her counsel. He further

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top