2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 733
CRL.REV.P. 1040/2023 and connected matter
Page 1 of 3
$~12 & 13
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
CRL.REV.P.
1040/2023,
CRL.M.A.
26841/2023,
CRL.M.A. 26842/2023 & CRL.M.A. 26843/2023
HARISH CHANDRA PRASAD
..... Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Kamlesh Kr. Mishra,
Dipak Raj, Mr. Nitin Kr.
Nayak, Mr. Kailash Kr.
Jha,
Mr.
Aditya,
Mr.
Bibhuti Bhushan Mishra &
Ms. Chandana, Advs.
versus
GEETA DEVI AND ANR.
..... Respondents
Through:
Mr.
Rakesh
Sachdeva,
Adv. for R-1.
+
CRL.REV.P.
1223/2023,
CRL.M.A.
31077/2023,
CRL.M.A. 31078/2023 & CRL.M.A. 31080/2023
HARISH CHANDRA PRASAD
..... Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Kamlesh Kr. Mishra,
Dipak Raj, Mr. Nitin Kr.
Nayak, Mr. Kailash Kr.
Jha,
Mr.
Aditya,
Mr.
Bibhuti Bhushan Mishra &
Ms. Chandna, Advs.
versus
GEETA DEVI AND ORS
..... Respondents
Through:
Mr.
Rakesh
Sachdeva,
Adv. for R-1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN
KAMLESH KUMAR MISHRA
%
03.01.2024
1.
The petitioner has filed the present Revision Petitions
challenging ex-parte judgment dated 08.05.2020, passed by the
learned Trial Court in Mt.No.614/2017, whereby the petitioner
was directed to pay a maintenance of ₹7,500/- per month to
Respondent No. 1. The petitioner has also impugned the orders
dated 23.02.2021, 06.03.2021 and 02.08.2023, passed by the
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/01/2024 at 18:24:40
Page 2 of 3
learned Trial Court in Execution Petition No.77/2020, whereby
the amount lying in the petitioner’s pension account was
attached.
2.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
impugned order dated 08.05.2020 was passed ex-parte and the
petitioner became aware of the passing of the said order only
when his pension was attached pursuant to the orders dated
23.02.2021, 06.03.2021 and 02.08.2023, passed in Execution
Petition No. 77/2020, arising out of the said impugned judgment
dated 08.05.2020.
3.
He submits that the learned Trial Court has passed the
impugned judgment dated 08.05.2020 without ascertaining
whether the respondent was ever married to the petitioner.
4.
He submits that Respondent No. 1 was hired by the
petitioner way back in 1990s to take care of his ailing wife. He
also relies upon Form-5, issued under Rule 7 of the CCS
(Commutation of Pension) Rules, 1981, in relation to the
communication of the nominee of the pensioner, wherein a
categorical declaration has been made that the wife of the
petitioner had expired on 22.10.2005.
5.
He further submits that the pension of the petitioner has
been attached contrary to the provisions of Section 60(1)(g) of
the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, which categorically provides
that the stipends and gratuities allowed to pensioners of the
government, shall not be liable for attachment.
6.
Issue notice.
7.
Mr. Rakesh Sachdeva, Adv., who appears on advance
service, accepts notice on behalf of Respondent No. 1. He
submits that he will file his Vakalatnama within a period of one
week. Let the same be done before the next date of hearing.
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/01/2024 at 18:24:40
Page 3 of 3
8.
He further submits that Respondent No. 1 is an illiterate
woman, and does not have the marriage certificate as the same is
in the custody of the petitioner. He further submits that
Respondent No. 1 also has two children out of the wedlock with
the petitioner.
9.
He submits that he will place on record the birth
certificates of the children which clearly mention the petitioner’s
name as the father.
CRL.M.A. 26843/2023 in CRL.REV.P. 1040/2023
CRL.M.A. 31079/2023 in CRL.REV.P. 1223/2023
10.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, without prejudice to the
petitioner’s rights and contentions, volunteers to pay a sum of
₹10,000/- every month from the date to Respondent No. 1. He
further submits that the sum of ₹10,000/- for the month of
January, 2024 would be paid to Respondent No. 1 within a period
of one week from the date.
11.
In view of the above, the operation of the impugned
judgment dated 08.05.2020, is stayed till the next date of hearing.
The proceedings pending before the Execution Court in
Execution Petition No. 77/2020, are also stayed till the next date
of hearing.
12.
The orders dated 23.02.2021, 06.03.2021 and 02.08.2023,
passed in Execution Petition No. 77/2020 attaching the pension
of the petitioner are also suspended till the next date of hearing.
13.
Respondent No. 2 is directed to release any amount, which
has been attached pursuant to the aforesaid orders passed by the
Trial Court, in favour of the petitioner.
14.
List on 22.04.2024.
AMIT MAHAJAN, J
JANUARY 3, 2024/‘SK’
This is a digitally signed order