SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 5917

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
ASHU SINGHAL – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS – Respondent


ORDER

(ORAL)

CM No.42035/2017 Allowed subject to just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 10302/2017 Petitioner is a Group ‘B’ employee of respondent-Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), who vide impugned order of 8th November, 2017 (Annexure A-7) has been transferred from Sahibabad to Mumbai. The grievance of petitioner is that the impugned transfer is contrary to the Transfer Policy (Annexure A-6) which provides for transfer within the zone. Petitioner asserts that petitioner has been transferred outside his zone.

Mr.B.K.Sood, who appears on behalf of respondent-Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) draws the attention of this Court to Clause 5 of the Transfer Policy (Annexure A-6) to point out that the transfer can be outside the zone also for administrative reasons and submits on instructions that the impugned transfer is, in fact, on the ground of administrative exigencies. To assert so, Mr.B.K.Sood, learned counsel for respondent-Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) has produced some office notings of the respondent while claiming privilege and submits that the impugned transfer of petitioner is well justified.

On the other hand, learned counsel for the petitioner asserts that the transfer of petitioner is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top