SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 5431

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
AMARJEET – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


JUDGMENT

VIBHU BAKHRU, J

1. The appellant has filed the present appeal impugning a judgment dated 08.04.2016 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, North West 01, Rohini District Courts, Delhi, whereby the appellant was convicted for an offence under Section 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO). The appellant also impugns the order on sentence dated 18.04.2016, whereby he was sentenced to ten years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine of ₹10,000/- for committing an offence under Section 6 of the POCSO. The appellant was also directed to serve simple imprisonment for a further period of six months, if he defaulted in the payment of the said fine.

2. The impugned judgment was rendered in connection with a case arising from FIR No. 478/14, under Section 6 of the POCSO and Section 376(2)(f) of the IPC, registered with P.S. Aman Vihar, on 13.05.2014. The said FIR was registered at the instance of the mother of the child victim. She stated that after the death of her first husband Kamal, she had married the appellant Amarjeet (accused). The victim was born from her earlier wedlock. She alleged that the accused had sexually assaulted the victim.

3. She alleged

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top