SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 62

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CHARANJEET SINGH & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS – Respondent


JUDGMENT

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

1. Petitioners impugn order dated 14.12.2017 whereby the revisional court had allowed the revision petition filed by the respondent nos. 2 and 3 impugning order on charge of the Trial Court dated 07.09.2013 and discharged respondent nos. 2 and 3 of the charges which were framed against them by the Trial Court for the offences under Section 420/120-B of the IPC.

2. Petitionersare the complainants and, on their complaint, FIR No. 156/2003 at Police Station Kotla Mubarakpur had been registered.

3. Petitioners and the respondent nos. 2 and 3 were partners in a partnership firm by the name – Indian Organic Food along with one Shri Baldev Singh. The current account in the name of the firm in State Bank of India was operated by all the five partners jointly and severally.

4. One Mr. Buecker of Germany who was friend of respondent nos. 2 and 3was inducted as partner in the firm. However, he subsequently resigned on 19.01.1999. Commercial relations between the firm and Mr. Buecker continued. It is alleged that in March 2002 differences arose between the partners of the firm – Indian Organic Food. Subsequently, respondent nos. 2 and 3 intimated the State Bank of Ind

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top