SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 2319

$~

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1924/1999 Reserved on: February 17, 2016 Decision on: March 23, 2016 APEEJAY SURRENDERA PARK HOTELS LTD. AND ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr Lalit Bhasin, Advocate with Ms Ratna Dwivedi Dhingra and Ms Bhavna Dhami, Advocates.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr Ashok Manchanda, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms Vibhooti Malhotra, Junior Standing Counsel and Mr Amino Aziz, Advocate.

AND + W.P.(C) 2130/1999 FEDERATION OF HOTEL AND RESTAURANT ASSOCIATIONS OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr Lalit Bhasin, Advocate with Ms Ratna Dwivedi Dhingra and Ms Bhavna Dhami, Advocates.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Chaudhary with Mr. Raghvendra Singh and Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Advocates. CORAM:

JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

J U D G M E N T

% 23.03.2016 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J:

1. These writ petitions seek a declaration that Section 194-I of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’) does not apply to the Hotel Industry since the charges for a room in a hotel is, according to them, not ‘rent’ in terms of Explanation to Section 194-I of the Act.

Profile of the petitioners

2. Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1924 of 1999 is by M/s Apeejay – Surrendera Park Hotels Limited (‘ASPHL’), Petitioner No. 1 and Ms. Priya Paul, shareholder of Petitioner No. 1. ASPHL is a public limited company which runs a five star hotel in New Delhi by the name 'Park Hotel'. ASPHL offers a number of facilities and amenities to its guests. It is stated that the charges for a room in the hotel includes not only charges for use and occupation of the room but also for water, electricity, air- conditioning, telephone facility, and various other items or amenities provided for guests in the room. The room tariff charge is therefore stated to be “a composite charge for all the above and not merely for occupying the room alone.”

3. Writ Petition (Civil) No. 2130 of 1999 is by the Federation of Hotel & Restaurant Associations of India (‘FHRAI’) (Petitioner No. 1), M/s Asian Hotels Limited (‘AHL’) (Petitioner No. 2) and Mr. Sushil Gupta, (Petitioner No. 3) who is the Managing Director (‘MD’) and a shareholder of AHL. FHRAI is stated to be an apex body of hotels and restaurants in India and formed to protect their interests.

Section 194-I as enacted and at present

4. Section 194-I of the Act was inserted with effect from 1st June 1994. The said provision, as it existed at the time of the filing of these petitions, reads as under:

194 - I. "Any person, not being an individual or a Hindu undivided family, who is responsible for paying to any person any income by way of rent, shall, at the time of credit of such income to the account of the payee or at the time of payment thereof in cash or by the issue of a cheque or draft or by any other mode, whichever is earlier, deduct income tax thereon at the rate of –

a. fifteen per cent if the payee is an individual or a Hindu undivided family; and b. twenty per cent in other cases;

Provided that no deduction shall be made under this section where the amount of such income or, as the case may be, the aggregate of the amounts of such income credited or paid or likely to be credited or paid during the financial year by the aforesaid person to the account of, or to, the payee, does not exceed one hundred and twenty thousand rupees.

Explanation - For the purpose of this section, -

(i) "rent" means any payment, by whatever name called, under any lease, sublease, tenancy or any other agreement or arrangement for the use of any land or any building ( including factory building), together with furniture, fittings and the land appurtenant thereto, whether or not such building is owned by the payee;

(ii) where any income is credited to any account, whether called "Suspense account" or by any other name, in the books of account of the person liable to pay such income, such crediting shall be deemed to be credit of such income to the account of the payee and the provisions of this section shall apply accordingly."

5. It is necessary to note that the definition of 'rent' in Section 194-I of the Act has since undergone a change. It now reads as under:

“194-I. Any person, not being an individual or a Hindu undivided family, who is responsible for paying to a resident any income by way of rent, shall, at the time of credit of such income to the account of the payee or at the time of payment thereof in cash or by the issue of a cheque or draft or by any other mode, whichever is earlier, deduct income-tax thereon at the rate of—

(a) two per cent for the use of any machinery or plant or equipment; and (b) ten per cent for the use of any land or building (including factory building) or land appurtenant to a building (including factory building) or furniture or fittings:

Provided that no deduction sha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top