SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 3112

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
SHRI MALKHAN SINGH AND ORS. – Appellant
Versus
FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER DELHI AND ORS. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

I. S. MEHTA, J.

1. Instant petitions under Article 226 and 227 of The Constitution of India have been filed by the present petitioners against the order dated 31.07.2014 passed by the Ld. Financial Commissioner, dated 07.10.2013 passed by the Collector Revenue DC/North and the order dated 18.01.2013 passed by the Tehsildar.

2. The brief facts stated are that Sh. Layak Ram S/o Kanhiya was the recorded co-owner of 1/3 share of Khata no. 81/69 and 1/2 share of Khata no. 73/62 along with his two brothers namely Desraj S/o Kanhiya and Kehar Singh S/o Kanhiya in the aforesaid agriculture land situated within the revenue estate of village Mohd. Pur Ramjanpur, Delhi.

3. On 13.01.1995 Layak Ram S/o Kanhiya Lal died leaving behind three married daughters i.e. Savitri, Bimla and Darshana (Respondent No. 2 to 4), no male child was born during the life time of Layak Ram. After the death of Late Layak Ram mutation proceedings pertaining to agricultural land comprised in khata no. 75(4-16), 76(4-16), 77 (4-16), 78 min (1-16), 155 (4-16), 231 (1-8), 230 (1-12), 233 (4-12), 336 (3- 9), 339 (4-10) & 340 (2-3), 227 (4-16), 228 (4-16), 232 (4-13) total measuring 52 Bigha 19 Biswa (which is share

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top