JUDGMENT

% (ORAL)

For appointment on the post of ‘Sanitary Assistant, Grade-III’ (now ‘House Keeper, Grade-III’), a waitlist was drawn in the year 2008. Petitioners vide Representations (Annexures P-15 to P-18) made between July, 2015 to September, 2015, had sought appointment to the post of House Keeper, Grade-III by submitting that it has been learnt through replies got under the Right to Information Act, 2005 that the life of a waitlist panel is not restricted and a decision was taken way back in the year 2012 by the Competent Authority to appoint all the thirty one waitlisted candidates without restricting to a particular time frame.

Learned counsel for petitioners submits that it has been reliably learnt that from the year 2008 to till now, the vacancies have increased to thirty and respondents are trying to fill up these vacancies from casual employees instead of appointing the waitlisted candidates. Representations of petitioner have been disposed of by respondent vide order of 17th September, 2015 (Annexure P-19) intimating that the matter is sub judice in the Court in W.P.(C) 1680/2011 Harish Kumar Vs. UOI & Ors. and so, no action is required to be taken.

Learned counsel for