SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 2968

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
VIKAS AGGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
TRIPURARI MANI TRIPATHI – Respondent


ORDER (ORAL)

1. The petitioner had instituted a criminal complaint case (CC No.18672/2016) against the respondent (accused) alleging commission of offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 having been committed. It appears on the basis of pre-summoning inquiry, the respondent stood summoned as accused.

2. During the course of proceedings that followed, the parties took the dispute to the process of mediation where they entered into a settlement on 13.03.2012, in terms of which the respondent agreed to pay the cheque amount of Rs.45 lacs to the petitioner (complainant) by 31.07.2012. The case thereafter came up before the Metropolitan Magistrate on 21.03.2012 when the report of the said settlement was placed before the court, the case having been adjourned for “part payment”. It appears that the matter was adjourned on certain dates on which some payment was made by the accused, however, the settlement terms not having been fully complied with.

3. The respondent (accused) thereafter absented himself from the proceedings, this resulting in duress process being issued against him followed by proclamation under section 82 of the Code of Criminal Procedu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top