Back
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MR. J.R. MIDHA, J
HS BEDI – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to judgment and decree. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. tenant's vacation of property. (Para 4) |
| 3. landlord's insistence for rent. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. obligations of landlord and tenant on lease termination. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. refusal of landlord to take possession. (Para 9 , 11) |
| 6. false claims and their implications. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 7. suggestions to curb frivolous litigation. (Para 15) |
JUDGMENT
1. The appellant has challenged the judgment and decree for Rs.8,93,892/- along with interest thereon @ 9% per annum passed by the learned Additional District Judge in favour of the respondent and against the appellant.
2. The appellant was the landlord and the respondent was the tenant of the property bearing no. B-529, New Friends Colony, New Delhi. For the sake of convenience, the appellant and the respondent are referred to as the “landlord” and “tenant” respectively.
3. Relevant facts 3.1. Vide registered lease deed dated 27th April, 1998, the landlord leased out property bearing No.B-529, New Friends Colony, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “suit property”) to the tenant for a period of three years with effect from 15th April, 1998 upto 14th April, 2001 at the monthly r
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
