HIGH COURT OF DELHI
KIRAN TANEJA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
J UDGMENT
1. This judgment shall decide present petition under section 482 code of criminal code of criminal procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred as “the Code”) for quashing of proceeding and setting aside the orders dated 27.1.2018, 19.10.2019 and 08.11.2019 passed by the court of Shri Sanjay Khangwal, ASJ, Special Judge, ACB Delhi in CC bearing no. 55/17 (332/2019) and application bearing no. 2069/2020 filed by the applicant Vijay Gautam for impleadment.
2. The factual background necessary to mention is that Satya Devi Gautam was the recorded owner of the property bearing no. D-79, Panchsheel Enclave, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as “the property”). Satya Devi Gautam expired on 25.01.2011 and thereafter Ravi Dutt Gautam became the recorded owner of the property who expired on 28.04.2011 without leaving any legal heirs. Thereafter, Renu Joshi r/o D-15, Indra Enclave, Sainik Farm, New Delhi claimed that the property has been bequeathed to her by virtue of Will stated to be executed in her favour by Ravi Dutt Gautam wherein she was mentioned as sole beneficiary.
2.1 Parmil Mittal (hereinafter referred to as “the complainant”) made a complaint in larger public interest to the Ad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.