SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 5623

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
ROHIT KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J. (Oral)

BAIL APPLN. 3250/2021

1. Present application has been moved under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No. 419/2021 lodged on 29th July, 2021 at PS Hari Nagar under Sections 419/420/120B/34 IPC read with Section 66C/66(D) I.T. Act, 2000.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that all the accused persons have already been admitted to bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that in fact the petitioner is an actor and producer in the bollywood and has produced certain successful movies. It has been submitted that that the accused has been falsely implicated in the present case as his brother Sanjeev Kumar was arrested in this case.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that accused Sanjeev Kumar has already been granted bail by the learned MM/ Tis Hazari Courts, vide order dated 12th August, 2021. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the main allegation against present petitioner is that his brother Sanjeev Kumar who is also director in the company of the petitioner i.e. “Rangrezaa Flims” had deposited some amount. Learned counsel submits that mere deposit of amount by a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top