SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 6327

$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: September 29, 2016 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 63/2015 MS BINDU CHAUDHARY ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.P.Acharya, Advocate versus SHRI DEEPAK SUGA ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Shikha Sapra, Advocate CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J. (Oral)

C.M. No. 9083/2015

1. For the reasons stated in the application, 135 days delay in filing the appeal is condoned.

2. The application is disposed of.

MAT.APP.(F.C.) 63/2015

1. The appellant/wife is in appeal seeking enhancement of maintenance, awarded vide order dated November 19, 2014, by the learned Judge, Family Court. While disposing of the application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, filed by her in HMA No.200/2014, she has been ‘ ‘

granted maintenance of 5,000 per month in addition to 2,000 per Court ‘

visit towards her expenses for visit and 500 as DA per Court visit.

2. The respondent/husband filed a petition in the year 2013 seeking dissolution of marriage under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. On notice of the divorce petition being received, the appellant/wife filed an application u

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top