O R D E R

% 10.08.2016 IA No. 48/2016 (seeking deletion of Defendant No. 2 from array of parties)

1. This is an application by Defendant No. 2 Google India Pvt. Ltd. („GIPL‟) seeking its deletion from the array of parties. The only reason why GIPL appears to have been made a party in the suit is that Defendant No. 1 YouTube LLC itself does not have an office in India.

2. Considering that Defendant No. 1 has participated in these proceedings, and is not disputing the jurisdiction of this Court, and with Defendant No. 1 having already complied with the interim injunction issued on 27th August 2015, the Court sees no reason why Defendant No. 2 should continue to be arrayed as a party to the suit.

3. The application is accordingly allowed and Defendant No. 2 is deleted from the array of parties.

IA No. 353/2016 (under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC)

4. In view of the above order in I. A. No. 48 of 2016, this application does not survive and is disposed of as such.

IA Nos. 17808/2015 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC) &

26085/2015 (under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC)

5. The interim injunction granted by this Court on 27th August 2015 in IA No. 17808 of 2015 filed by the Plaintiff Tata Sky Ltd. ('Tata Sky'