SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 1237

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
VISHAL TYAGI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


JUDGMENT

ANU MALHOTRA, J

1. The applicant vide the present application seeks the grant of bail in relation to FIR No.487/2017, Police Station Burari under Sections 366/354/354A/354B/376/506/392/411/323/341 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 4/8 of the POCSO Act, 2012 submitting inter alia to the effect that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case; that there are contradictions and variations in the complaint made by the prosecutrix and her statement under Section

164 of the Cr.P.C., 1973 and her deposition before the Court which contradictions are material in nature; that the applicant has been incarcerated for more than two years.

2. Notice of the application was issued to the State and to the prosecutrix through the Investigating Officer of the case. The prosecutrix put in appearance through video conferencing on 28.9.2021 and stated that she has now become a graduate and is currently working in retail banking and in reply to a specific Court query as to whether she opposes the bail application of the applicant or not, submitted that she opposed the same.

3. During the course of submissions that were made on the bail application on 28/9/2021, the learne

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top