SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 2365

$~5 (original side)

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS)139/2020 & I.A.4364/2020, I.A.6102/2020, I.A.6103/2020 AJAY PAL SHARMA ...Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sameer Kumar and Aditya Shankar, Advs.

Versus UDAIVEER SINGH ... Defendant Through: Mr. Saurabh Kirpal and Mr.

Anuroop Chakravarti, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGEMENT (ORAL)

% 28.07.2020 (video conferencing)

I.A. 6102/2020 (for condonation of delay)

1. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of two days, in filing the rejoinder, is condoned. Rejoinder is taken on record.

2. The application is disposed of.

I.A. 6103/2020

1. Subject to the attested affidavit being filed within 72 hours of resumption of normal court work, exemption, as sought, is granted for the present.

2. The application is disposed of.

IA 4364/2020 (Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC) in CS(OS)

139/2020

1. Detailed arguments were heard, on this IA, as advanced by Mr. Saurabh Kirpal, learned counsel for the defendant and Mr. Sameer Kumar, learned counsel for the plaintiff.

2. Consequent thereupon, it transpires that the present IA may be disposed of, without entering into the merits of the controversy.

3. For the sake of record, however,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top