Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
HUSSAIN AHMED – Appellant
Versus
STATE (NCT) OF DELHI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the appellant challenges a conviction related to robbery. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments address the conviction's validity and sentencing. (Para 4) |
| 3. witness testimony supports the case against the appellant. (Para 6) |
JUDGMENT
1. The present appeal has been preferred under Section 415 read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ( BNSS ) by the appellant challenging the judgment of conviction dated 27.04.2024 and the order on sentence dated 01.06.2024 passed by the learned ASJ-03, South East District, Saket Courts, New Delhi in Sessions Case No. 128/2022 arising out of FIR No. 328/2021 registered at Police Station Sarita Vihar, Delhi under Sections 394 /397/411/34 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act .
Signature Not Verified Signed By:GAUTAM CRL.A. 632/2024 Page 1 of 7 Vide the impugned judgment, the appellant was convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 394 /397/411/34 IPC and Section 25 Arms Act . By the order on sentence, he was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment (RI) for 10 years under Section 394 /34 IPC, RI for 10 years under Section 397 IPC, and simple imprisonment (SI) for 1 year under Section 25 of the Arms Act . All sen
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
