IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
C. HARI SHANKAR, AJAY DIGPAUL, JJ
AMAZON TECHNOLOGIES INC – Appellant
Versus
LIFESTYLE EQUITIES CV & ANR. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
01.07.2025
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
CM APPL. 26455/2025 Facilitative Index to the Judgment
| S. No. | Subject | Para Nos |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Opening para | 1 |
| 2 | A prefatory note | 2 – 5 |
| 3 | Appellant’s submission in a nutshell | 6 – 8 |
| 4 | The lis | 9 – 18 |
| 5 | Rival pleadings in the suit | 19 - 33 |
| 6 | The plaint | 20 – 30 |
| 7 | Replication of Lifestyle to written statement of Cloudtail | 31 – 33 |
| 8 | Related contentions of learned Senior Counsel for Amazon Tech | 34 – 36 |
| 9 | Trajectory of the suit before the learned Single Judge | 37 – 38 |
| 10 | The impugned judgment | 39 – 56 |
| 11 | Rival Submissions before us | |
| 12 | Submissions of Mr. Arvind Nigam | |
| 13 | A No infringement by Amazon Tech | 57 – 64 |
| 14 | B Order dated 2 March 2023 | 65 – 67 |
| 15 | C Re. apparent error in para 9 of impugned judgment | 68 |
| 16 | D Damages claimed could not have been enhanced without amendment, merely on the basis of evidence led during trial and in written submissions – itself insufficient to sustain enhanced damages – No opportunity to Amazon Tech to meet claim for enhanced damages – Violation of principles of natural justice | 69 – 74 |
| 17 | E Re. finding of Amazon Tech, Cloudtail and ASSPL operating as “single commercial entity” | 75 |
| 18 | F Misguided reliance on Licence Agreement dated 23 December 2015 | 76 – 77 |
| 19 | G Quantification of damages cannot be left | |

Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.