MODI-MUNDIPHARMA PVT. LIMITED vs SPECIALITY MEDITECH PVT. LTD.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Pravin Anand, Ms. Prachi Agarwal
For the Respondents: Mr. Gagan Gupta, Mr. Saurabh Gupta

JUDGMENT

C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

Facilitative Index to the Judgment

S. No.	Subject Para Nos
1	Introductory paras 1 – 3
2	The lis 4 – 8
3	Rival Pleadings before learned Single Judge
4	The plaint	9 – 9.2
5	Written Statement of Respondent 1	10
6	Written Statement of Respondent 2	11
7	Replication to Written Statement of	12

Respondent 2
8	Replication to Written Statement of Respondent 1	13 – 13.4
9	Proceedings before learned Single Judge	14 – 16
10	Issues framed in the suit	15
11	Impugned Judgment	17 – 17.6
12	Rival Stands of learned Counsel before this Court
13	Submissions of Mr. Pravin Anand 19 – 19.11
14	Submissions of Mr. Gagan Gupta 20 – 20.8
15	Analysis
16	Points arising for determination	21 – 23
17	Re. Issue (i) – Delay and laches	24 – 24.16
18	Re. Issue (ii) – Infringement vis-à-vis CONTIN family of marks of plaintiff	25 – 25.12
19	Relevant Statutory Provisions	25.1 – 25.1.24
20	Re. “family of marks” concept	25.11 – 25.11.15
21	The judgment in Amar Singh Chawal Wala	25.11.3 – 25.11.3.4
22	Re. Issue (iii) – Plea of infringement vis-à-vis FECONTIN-F registered trade mark	26 – 26.3
23	Re. finding of learned Single Judge that FECONTIN is a descriptive trade mark	26.1 – 26.1.18
24	On merits	26.2 – 26.2.14
25	Re. Issue (iv) – Passing Off	27 – 27.7
26	to which th