IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
NEERAJ JAIN – Appellant
Versus
TEHSIN & ORS. – Respondent
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral)
1. This Court by an Order dated 08.07.2025, had passed the following directions:
“3. The present Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure , 1908 [hereinafter referred to as “CPC”] impugning the award dated 27.01.2025 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, MACT (East) Karkardooma Courts, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Award”]. By the Impugned Award, the learned Tribunal has dismissed the Application seeking pre-mature release of the FDRs issued in the name of the Petitioner.
4. None appears for the Petitioner despite the matter being called out twice today.
5. A review of the Impugned Award shows that the Petitioner has sought pre- mature release of the FDRs giving a ground that he is unemployed and has no source of income. The learned Tribunal has examined this matter and found that a sum of Rs. 4 lacs have already been released to the Petitioner on 03.01.2024 and five FDRs in the sum of Rs. 1,70,000/- each were pre-maturely released on
13.05.2024.
5.1 The learned Tribunal has thus found that approximately, a sum of Rs.1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.