SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 3459

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
NEERAJ JAIN – Appellant
Versus
TEHSIN & ORS. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Amit Srivastava, Ms. Akanksha, Ms. Uzma
For the Respondents: None

HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral)

1. This Court by an Order dated 08.07.2025, had passed the following directions:

“3. The present Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure , 1908 [hereinafter referred to as “CPC”] impugning the award dated 27.01.2025 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, MACT (East) Karkardooma Courts, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Award”]. By the Impugned Award, the learned Tribunal has dismissed the Application seeking pre-mature release of the FDRs issued in the name of the Petitioner.

4. None appears for the Petitioner despite the matter being called out twice today.

5. A review of the Impugned Award shows that the Petitioner has sought pre- mature release of the FDRs giving a ground that he is unemployed and has no source of income. The learned Tribunal has examined this matter and found that a sum of Rs. 4 lacs have already been released to the Petitioner on 03.01.2024 and five FDRs in the sum of Rs. 1,70,000/- each were pre-maturely released on

13.05.2024.

5.1 The learned Tribunal has thus found that approximately, a sum of Rs.1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top