IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J
NIKUND KUMAR JHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF NCT DELHI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of allegations and applicant's prior conduct are central to bail decision. (Para 1 , 2) |
CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL)
1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 610/2024, registered at PS K.N. Katju Marg, North Delhi for offences under Section 498A/406/34 IPC, to which further offences including the offences under Section 376/328/354A/376D IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act were added in view of detailed statements of the prosecutrix recorded under Section 164 CrPC.
2. Learned counsel for the accused/applicant contends that the accused/applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated because on his BAIL APPLN. 1888/2025 Page 1 of 4 pages GIRISH Digitally signed by GIRISH Signature Not Verified KATHPALIA KATHPALIA Date: 2025.06.09 14:21:16 Digitally Signed +05'30'
complaint under Section 494 IPC, the prosecutrix was called by the police for preparing Action Taken Report. It is further contended that the allegations against the accused/applicant are basically those arising out of matrimonial disputes, so the accused/applicant deserves to be released on bail. Learned counsel for accused/applicant also submits that at the ti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.