Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, NAVIN CHAWLA, JJ
NEWGEN IT TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
NEWGEN SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeals impugn prior district court orders. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondent claims trademark ownership. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. parties' partnership agreement involved trademarks. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. trademark registrations and cease-and-desist notice. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. court's granting of ex-parte injunction. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 6. appellant challenges injunction order. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 7. appellant's arguments countered by respondent. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 8. court emphasizes party rights and encroachment. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 9. judicial authority and assessment of injunction. (Para 38 , 39 , 41) |
| 10. finality and conditions of dismissal. (Para 55 , 76) |
JUDGMENT
HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.
FAO (COMM) 73/2025 & CM APPLs. 15151-52/2025, 15154/2025 FAO (COMM) 75/2025 & CM APPLs. 15161-62/2025, 15164/2025
1. The present appeals filed by the Appellant under Section 13 (1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 read with Order XLIII Rule (1)(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short, „CPC‟) impugn the Orders dated 27.02.2025 and 05.03.2025 passed by the learned District Judge (Commercial)-05, South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
