SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 3564

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
VARUN TYAGI – Appellant
Versus
DAFFODIL SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED – Respondent


JUDGMENT

TEJAS KARIA, J

1. The Appellant has filed the present Appeal under Section 104 read with Order XLIII Rule 1(R) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”), being aggrieved by the order dated 03.06.2025 (“Impugned Order”), passed by the learned District Judge-06 (South), Saket Courts, South Delhi (“Trial Court”) in CS DJ 353/2025 (“Suit”).

2. The Impugned Order has allowed an interim injunction in favour of the Respondent restraining the Appellant from working with Digital India Corporation (“DIC”) and National E-Governance Division (“NeGD”) until the final disposal of the Suit filed before the learned Trial Court.

3. Vide the impugned order, it was held that the Respondent had a prima facie case against the Appellant, the balance of convenience lay in favour of the Respondent and if the alleged proprietary information, intellectual property, insider knowledge, source code, as the case maybe, is disclosed by the Appellant, the same shall be detrimental to the Respondent and its employees and will result in an irreparable injury to the Respondent.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND:

4. The dispute has arisen out of the Employment of the Appellant with the Respondent. The Appellant is an Inform

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top