$~93 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 01.05.2025 + W.P.(C) 5668/2025 GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr.Sujeet Kumar Mishra, Mr.Saarthak Bansal, Advs.

versus SHEELA DEVI .....Respondent Through: Mr.Padma Kumar S., Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL)

CM APPL. 25921/2025 (Exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 5668/2025 & CM APPL. 25922/2025

2. This petition has been filed, challenging the Order dated 14.05.2024 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as ‘Tribunal’) in O.A. No. 2817/2022, titled Sheela Devi v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors., whereby the learned Tribunal allowed the said O.A. filed by the respondent herein with the following directions:

“10. We find that on the analogy of the fact that work charge of the daily wager where 50% of the past services has to be counted for the purpose of pensionary benefits. On the same analogy, the same benefit cannot be denied to the applicant herein. Therefore, in the light of the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed