SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 3737

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ANOOP SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
BHUSHAN KUMAR NARULA & ORS – Respondent


* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on : 25 March2025 Judgment pronounced on: 06 May 2025 + RFA 486/2019 and CM appl. 23822/2019, CM APPL.

36866/2019, CM APPL. 53272/2019, CM APPL. 27751/2021 ANOOP SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Upamanyu Sharma, Adv.

versus BHUSHAN KUMAR NARULA & ORS. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSPC with Mr. Gokul Sharma, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA

J U D G E M E N T

1. The present regular first appeal is being preferred by the appellant under Section 96 read with Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [“CPC”], thereby assailing the impugned judgment dated 23.03.2019 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi [“Trial Court”] in Suit Bearing No. 28/2018.

BRIEF FACTS

2. Shorn off unnecessary details, the appellant/plaintiff filed a suit against the office bearers of respondent No. 8/CWGVAOA, [Commonwealth Games Village Apartment Owners Association], as well as respondent No. 6/Delhi Development Authority, [DDA] and respondent No. 7/Ministry of Urban Development3, who are the main parties, who are representing the members/residents, who are serving in the said

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top