IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RAJPAL – Appellant
Versus
GM HARYANA ROADWAYS DELHI – Respondent
$~P-2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on: 30.04.2025.
%
+ W.P.(C) 3419/2012 RAJPAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. M.K. Bhardwaj, Mrs. Priyanka M. Bhardwaj, Mr. Maria Mugesh Kannan & Mr. Himanshu Bhardwaj, Advocates.
versus GM HARYANA ROADWAYS, DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Devender Kumar Saini, Advocate. [M:-9868070910, 8588814210]
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
JUDGMENT
1. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner assails a disciplinary order dated 30.11.2010, and an appellate order dated 11.08.2011, by which the original disciplinary order was modified.
A. Facts
2. The petitioner worked as a bus conductor with the respondent – Haryana Roadways, since the year 1981. At the time of the incidents mentioned in the disciplinary proceedings, he was posted with the respondent in Delhi.
3. A chargesheet was issued to the petitioner on 10.01.2006, under Rule 7 of the Haryana Service (Penalty & Appeal) Rules, 1987, on the Signature Not Verified Signed By:SOMYA W.P.(C) 3419/2012 Page 1 of 13 following Articles of Charge:
“It has been reported by the Inspectors of this Unit against you Shri Rajpal, Conductor No. 134 that on 4.1.2006, yo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.