SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 4047

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RAJPAL – Appellant
Versus
GM HARYANA ROADWAYS DELHI – Respondent


$~P-2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on: 30.04.2025.

%

+ W.P.(C) 3419/2012 RAJPAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. M.K. Bhardwaj, Mrs. Priyanka M. Bhardwaj, Mr. Maria Mugesh Kannan & Mr. Himanshu Bhardwaj, Advocates.

versus GM HARYANA ROADWAYS, DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Devender Kumar Saini, Advocate. [M:-9868070910, 8588814210]

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

JUDGMENT

1. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner assails a disciplinary order dated 30.11.2010, and an appellate order dated 11.08.2011, by which the original disciplinary order was modified.

A. Facts

2. The petitioner worked as a bus conductor with the respondent – Haryana Roadways, since the year 1981. At the time of the incidents mentioned in the disciplinary proceedings, he was posted with the respondent in Delhi.

3. A chargesheet was issued to the petitioner on 10.01.2006, under Rule 7 of the Haryana Service (Penalty & Appeal) Rules, 1987, on the Signature Not Verified Signed By:SOMYA W.P.(C) 3419/2012 Page 1 of 13 following Articles of Charge:

“It has been reported by the Inspectors of this Unit against you Shri Rajpal, Conductor No. 134 that on 4.1.2006, yo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top