IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
ADITYA RAI GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedure followed violated natural justice. (Para 1 , 2) |
JUDGMENT
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.
1. Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the “ Cr.P.C .”) has been filed for quashing of Judgment dated 23.04.2018 and the Order on Sentence dated 23.04.2018 of learned MM.
2. Briefly stated, FIR No. 0119/2018 dated 24.02.2018 was registered against the Petitioner under Section 3 Delhi Prevention of Defacement of Property Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the “DPDP Act”). He was informed by one police official on 03.04.2018 to appear before the Court on 20.04.2018. Accordingly, he appeared before the learned MM and was not represented by any Counsel. He again appeared before the Court on 23.04.2018. He was completely uninformed about the proceedings that took place before the learned MM. On 23.04.2018, he was asked to deposit a fine of Rs.1,000/- before the Court. He duly complied with the directions despite the fact that he was not aware of the nature of the proceedings.
3. In October, 2019, he applied for renewal of his Passport and upon verification; his conviction
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.